+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By gixxer_drew
  • 1 Post By gixxer_drew

Thread: INDYCAR Releases Findings On Dan Wheldon's Fatal Crash

  1. #1
    Administrator ucfbrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ventura, Calif.
    Posts
    5,639
    Liked
    2356 times

    Default INDYCAR Releases Findings On Dan Wheldon's Fatal Crash

    For those who haven't seen this already, click the link or read the INDYCAR release pasted below:

    INDYCAR Releases Findings On Dan Wheldon's Fatal Crash | Performance Racing Industry


    “There are multiple factors that are not uncommon to racing that came together in a way that claimed Dan’s life,” said INDYCAR President of Operations Brian Barnhart, who was involved in the investigation. "It is a tragedy. Our thoughts and support will always be with Dan’s family.”

    Wheldon, who started from the rear of the 34-car field, was running 24th on Lap 11 when the accident that involved 15 cars occurred between Turns 1-2.

    The combined data from various technical resources provided INDYCAR officials insight into what transpired during the multi-car incident, including what happened to the No. 77 car during the accident.

    “INDYCAR’s commitment to safety was enhanced by Dan Wheldon’s testing throughout 2011 of the new car to be used by INDYCAR in 2012,” INDYCAR CEO Randy Bernard said during a news conference at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway that was streamed live on indycar.com.

    “The 2012 IZOD IndyCar Series season ushers in an era of a new race car and the opportunity for continued safety advancements. Dan Wheldon was instrumental in the testing and development of this new car and the safety innovations that it represents. We are thankful for his efforts and commitment to racing.

    "These observations will be part of a continuous process to improve racing so it's both competitive and as safe as possible.”

    The accident review revealed that Wheldon’s path on the lower portion of the race track was blocked by the multi-car crash he was approaching. About 2.4 seconds prior to contact with the left-rear tire of the No. 83 car, Wheldon reduced throttle to 55 percent and applied the brakes to decelerate from 224 mph on the front straightaway to 165 mph in Turn 1. A second later, the throttle was reduced to less than 10 percent.

    After striking the No. 83 car’s tire, the No. 77 car became airborne and began to roll to the right. The right rear of the car made contact with the racing surface and the chassis traveled rearward first toward the Turn 2 SAFER Barrier. The chassis then rotated so it was traveling in race direction parallel to the fencing along the top of the permanent wall behind the SAFER Barrier, with the cockpit open toward the fencing.

    The chassis impacted a vertical post along the right side of the tub that – as the car passed by -- created significant damage extending from the pedal bulkhead, through the cockpit and shearing off the roll hoop. As the pole intruded the cockpit, the impact with the driver’s helmeted head produced non-survivable blunt force trauma.
 
The side intrusion panels, which were added to IZOD IndyCar Series cars in 2008, along with the driver’s restraints performed as designed, according to review of physical evidence.

    The fencing, including post, cables and fabric at Las Vegas Motor Speedway, was found to have performed to expectations in retaining a race car from leaving the track. In the report, INDYCAR stated its preference for the fabric being on the inside of the track instead of its present configuration.
    The response to the scene by INDYCAR’s Holmatro Safety Team was rapid and decisive, according to the review, and there was no evidence of vehicle mechanical or structural issues contributing to the accident.

    INDYCAR analyzed data from the accident data recorders carried on board each race car involved in the crash, the on-board data acquisition system from teams, timing and scoring data, video, still photographs and the physical evidence. Additionally, reports were filed by track safety personnel, technical personnel, race control personnel and medical personnel, and information was provided by the chief medical officer of Las Vegas Motor Speedway and the Clark County Coroner.

    Wolf Technical Services provided independent assurance that the investigation protocol, evidence examined and reviewed, and the conclusions reached are consistent and appropriate to standard scientific and engineering investigation methods.

    Examination of video of the incident demonstrates normal “pack racing” that is common on high-banked ovals. However, there was almost unlimited movement on the track surface under race conditions not previously experienced that is attributed to track geometry beyond banking. Such freedom of movement outside of normal racing grooves not only increased the probability for car-to-car contact, but made it more difficult for drivers to predict the movement of other drivers.

    "It wasn't a challenge to these highly-talented drivers," Barnhart said, noting that the now decommissioned chassis ran more that 2 million miles in its eight years with one fatality. "You don't want to get to the limitless racing capabilities that we had at Vegas so we'll try to identify an aerodynamic package (through testing) that makes it more challenging for the drivers. We have to create through extensive testing is a limit. They have to know there is a line that they can't cross, and I think that will make the racing better as we look at new venues."

    The 34-car starting field was determined to be acceptable based on factors such as length and width of the race track and pit space capability, and review of the incident supports the conclusion. Similar consequences could have occurred with any size starting field at any track.

    As is customary protocol, INDYCAR conducts a series of on-site inspections and an on-track test to confirm the compatibility of its race cars to new or reconfigured racetracks. The inspections of Las Vegas Motor Speedway included a two-day compatibility and performance test on Nov. 15, 2010, by drivers Scott Dixon of Target Chip Ganassi Racing and Ryan Briscoe of Team Penske. Private testing by IZOD IndyCar Series and Firestone Indy Lights teams followed.

    Following the incident, INDYCAR assembled a technical committee of sanctioning body personnel, team engineers and Dallara representatives to focus on the aerodynamics and mechanical considerations of IZOD IndyCar Series cars competing on high-banked 1.5-mile ovals. It determined that each high-banked oval has unique characteristics, and each should be considered individually.
    INDYCAR will not sanction a race at Las Vegas Motor Speedway in 2012 as was announced in October, but will conduct testing at the facility with the next-generation car to determine compatibility and performance for a potential return in 2013.

    "Las Vegas is a great city, a resort destination. Our fans, our sponsors and everyone likes Las Vegas and it's a great place for the race," Bernard said. "But I don't want to go back there if the conditions aren't right and it's not safe for our race cars."

    The 2012 Dallara Automobili chassis enhances safety components such as side intrusion panels and wheel tethers. The cockpit is longer and wider than the decommissioned monocoque, which allows for additional padding underneath and behind the driver. Also, a “floating headrest” works in conjunction with the mandatory FHR (Frontal Head Restraint) attached to the helmet. Additionally, driver positioning provides enhanced sightlines.

    Reduction of wheel-to-wheel contact also has been incorporated into the new car as well as a standardized location on the steering wheel for the yellow light (on-track caution) warning system and improvement of the head surround latch system to make driver extrication easier and quicker.

    "When you have a tragedy like this, it's disappointing that the only good thing that comes out of it is improvement in the future," Barnhart said. "The best thing we can do is take this situation, learn from it and move forward. Safety is an evolutionary process. The 2012 car has been under design for about 18 months and many components of the IR3 (chassis) have carried over into the 2012 car design as well as several areas of improvement that we're looking for as the continuation of that safety.

    "One of the big things will be extensive testing to do our best to replicate race conditions to identify the overall track geometry of any track we're looking to run IndyCars to try to come up with the best understanding of the aerodynamic package, the technical specifications to allow us to race there as well as we possibly can."

    IZOD IndyCar Series teams were taking delivery of their first next-generation car and Chevrolet and Honda were continuing on-track development of their engines at Sebring International as the news conference was being conducted.

    "It's good to see that the accident review has been released and we have more answers about Las Vegas," Dreyer & Reinbold Racing co-owner Dennis Reinbold said. "I know that there were a number of meetings following up after Las Vegas to really look into the issue and see what could have been avoided. I believe that the report stated the events accurately and that several factors coincided to produce a 'perfect storm.'

    "We really need to commend INDYCAR for continuing to try to find ways to make the cars safer. We keep striving for safety and that's the No. 1 goal."

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    328
    Liked
    223 times

    Default

    God bless indycar management. They've saved the day once again.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,987
    Liked
    1485 times

    Default

    If they had to make the press release that long, you know it's a lie.
    The deposed former Sheriff of trackHQ . . .

    2006 Porsche 997 Carerra Coupe 6-MT - daily driver
    1992 Honda (Acura) NSX 5-MT - classic investment I couldn't resist and occasionally drive
    2004 Honda S2000 AP2 6-MT - my last track day car (FOR SALE or not, depending on how I feel when I fall out of bed tomorrow morning)
    2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR 6-MT - when I need a backseat, 4-doors, or a real trunk, and still want to haul ass . . .

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    575
    Liked
    53 times

    Default

    I thought it interesting that the description starts with Wheldon's name (...Wheldon reduced throttle to 55...) then as the description gets closer to the fatal point, goes to car number (...the No. 77 car became airborne and began to roll to the right) and then just states the, "the impact with the driver’s helmeted head produced non-survivable blunt force trauma."

  5. #5
    Gearhead gixxer_drew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    649
    Liked
    49 times

    Default

    Its a boring read, its just their take on why nobody did anything wrong and nothing needs to change.
    momofoolio likes this.
    Andrew M Brilliant
    Aerodynamicist / Race Engineer

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,987
    Liked
    1485 times

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gixxer_drew View Post
    Its a boring read, its just their take on why nobody did anything wrong and nothing needs to change.
    I would agree with you if I actually read it.
    The deposed former Sheriff of trackHQ . . .

    2006 Porsche 997 Carerra Coupe 6-MT - daily driver
    1992 Honda (Acura) NSX 5-MT - classic investment I couldn't resist and occasionally drive
    2004 Honda S2000 AP2 6-MT - my last track day car (FOR SALE or not, depending on how I feel when I fall out of bed tomorrow morning)
    2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR 6-MT - when I need a backseat, 4-doors, or a real trunk, and still want to haul ass . . .

  7. #7
    Track Whore Pure EvoIX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fullerton, CA
    Posts
    1,728
    Liked
    299 times

    Default

    lazy bum. :P
    Zhong (Evo IX) | Angry Panda Racing

    1:53.396 @ BRP CW13 - 11/14/13
    1:47.2xx @ Laguna Seca - 11/28/10
    2:03.026 @ Thill CCW Bypass - 12/20/14
    2:05.100 @ CVR CCW - 1/16/11
    1:58.151 @ CVR CW - 5/5/13
    1:25.56x @ WSIR - 10/13/13
    1:23.128 @ SOW CW - 7/27/14
    1:22.2xx @ SOW CCW - 7/26/14
    1:46.0xx @ ACS Roval - 11/23/14
    1:11.299 @ ACS Infield - 5/18/14

    Fastest Limited/Mod Class Evo in Time Attack at WSIR
    2nd Fastest Limited/Mod Class Evo in Time Attack at BRP 13CW

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,987
    Liked
    1485 times

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pure EvoIX View Post
    lazy bum. :P
    You don't have to read very far to see what's going on with that press release . . .
    The deposed former Sheriff of trackHQ . . .

    2006 Porsche 997 Carerra Coupe 6-MT - daily driver
    1992 Honda (Acura) NSX 5-MT - classic investment I couldn't resist and occasionally drive
    2004 Honda S2000 AP2 6-MT - my last track day car (FOR SALE or not, depending on how I feel when I fall out of bed tomorrow morning)
    2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR 6-MT - when I need a backseat, 4-doors, or a real trunk, and still want to haul ass . . .

  9. #9
    Administrator ucfbrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ventura, Calif.
    Posts
    5,639
    Liked
    2356 times

    Default

    I actually read the whole thing.

    The release employs a lot of what we learned in grad school about crisis communication, and it is, ahem, carefully written.

  10. #10
    Smack-Talkin' Member J. Tyler's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,991
    Liked
    165 times

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gixxer_drew View Post
    Its a boring read, its just their take on why nobody did anything wrong and nothing needs to change.
    Precisely.

  11. #11
    Gearhead gixxer_drew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    649
    Liked
    49 times

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ucfbrett View Post
    I actually read the whole thing.

    The release employs a lot of what we learned in grad school about crisis communication, and it is, ahem, carefully written.
    I never like reading things where humans (especially ones who died) become just a car number. I know its just the litigation business... its an emotional thing on my part.

    Real people were effected by what happened. Dan and his family were hit the worst and there is a team of guys who not only had to live through this, but have to struggle in the aftermath. Good guys who do this for the love, not the money. I have a lot I would want to say about how I wish things would change, but there's no point and it would just get me in trouble anyway.

    I just think that there are two sides to doing justice to this, protect everyone from unjust criticism and the other side... to acknowledge that really something might be wrong... and changing it can avoid bad thing happening to other good people in the future. If I lived in a perfect world you could pursue the latter without people hunting for money out of an "admission of guilt" (simply taking responsibility).
    Last edited by gixxer_drew; 12-19-2011 at 06:45 PM.
    ucfbrett likes this.
    Andrew M Brilliant
    Aerodynamicist / Race Engineer

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts