+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: How much faster is re71r than z2/rs3?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    140
    Liked
    20 times

    Default How much faster is re71r than z2/rs3?

    Anyone tried both?
    I checked a test review at buttonwillow showing 3.5 sec faster than z2 with E46 M3.
    Most of my friends who drive S2000 told me there is only 1.x sec difference.
    VA(15) STI/FRS

  2. #2
    http://www.trackhq.com/Banners/yellowsitesponsor.gif emilio700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    3,768
    Liked
    2591 times

    Default

    Both Grassroots Motorsport and Tire Rack comptehensive test data on 200 tw tires.
    WWW.949RACING.COM
    SuperMiata

    Aside from their cost I never understood why people race them.
    But obviously I just dont get it. -fatbillybob

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Rolling Hills Estates
    Posts
    3,003
    Liked
    887 times

    Default

    https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests...y.jsp?ttid=202


    Summary: "Subjectively the BFGoodrich g-Force Rival S outscores the other tires by a small margin, combining strong performance with reasonable road manners. But when it comes to ultimate dry and wet performance among this group, the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R is the top rung on the evolutionary ladder. The Kumho Ecsta V720 gives the Potenza RE-71R a run for its money by delivering impressive dry performance, but brings along road manners so extreme that it's not for the faint of heart and not well suited to daily commuter duty. The Hankook Ventus R-S3 (Version 2) holds its own against tough competition, but from an outright performance perspective it's clear that newer designs are a little faster."

    Capturet.JPG

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts